Is Drone Hunting Ethical Or Cheating? is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.  Learn More…

Using drones in hunting has sparked a heated debate among hunters, wildlife enthusiasts, and conservationists.

While drones have become increasingly popular for deer recovery and surveys, using them to locate and kill an animal has raised significant ethical concerns and is rightfully illegal.

This article explores the ethical implications of using drones in hunting and the regulations surrounding their use.

Some hunters view it as cheating and argue that it undermines the principles of fair chase and sportsmanship. Others believe drones are another tool in the hunter’s arsenal and can be used responsibly.

Ethics of Drone Use

The use of drones in hunting, particularly for deer recovery and surveys, has sparked ongoing debate regarding the ethics and fairness of the sport.

While there are benefits to using drones for these purposes, such as improved efficiency and accuracy, some argue that it goes against the principles of fair chase and sportsmanship.

The ability to locate and track game from a distance, without physically being present, can be seen as an unfair advantage and takes away from the traditional hunting experience.

On the other hand, proponents of drone use argue that it can be a valuable tool for scouting and gathering information about game populations.

They also point out that drones have become increasingly popular in other fields, such as agriculture and wildlife management, and hunters should not be excluded from using this technology.

Whether or not to use a drone in scouting/hunting comes down to personal ethics and judgment.

It is up to individual hunters to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks and decide to align with their values.

read.. Top Public Land Hunting Tactics

State Regulations

State regulations regarding unmanned aerial vehicles in wildlife management vary across the United States. Some states prohibit using drones for hunting entirely, while others permit their use for specific purposes.

“But other states like Ohio, Wisconsin, Illinois, and Missouri allow for the use of drones for recovering deer after the shot.”


According to, the use of drones for hunting purposes is illegal in Pennsylvania, and fines are dealt with for anyone found to be illegally using a drone for hunting in Alabama.

As the popularity of drones among hunters continues to rise, it is essential to consider the potential impact on wildlife populations and the ethical considerations associated with their use.

Impact on Hunting Experience

Integrating unmanned aerial vehicles in wildlife management has generated discourse about the impact on the traditional hunting experience, prompting hunters to reflect on the extent to which technological advancements should be employed in their pursuit of game.

Some argue that using drones takes away from the traditional hunting experience, as it eliminates the need for physical exertion and patience, which are fundamental aspects of the sport.


  • It allows hunters to bypass animals’ natural instincts and behaviors that must be studied to identify their habits and patterns.
  • Relying on drones to locate game will diminish the skill and knowledge required for successful hunting.
  • It takes away from the traditional hunting experience


  • Technology has always been a part of hunting, and drones are another tool to enhance the experience.
  • Drones can give hunters a different perspective and enable them to cover more ground without trampling through rugged terrain.
  • Drones can be helpful for scouting and locating game, ultimately leading to more successful hunts.

However, the debate over the ethics of using drones in hunting is ongoing.

It is up to individual hunters to decide whether or not to use them, considering the impact on the traditional hunting experience and ethical principles.

My Point of View

From my perspective, I find using drones for wildlife management acceptable. However, the question arises regarding using drones after the shot to locate game that has not deceased yet.

How long should one wait before taking action? Is it morally acceptable to go and “finish” the deer off?

It’s undoubtedly a grey area. As hunters, I strongly believe that we should prioritize ethical hunting practices and adhere to the principles of fair chase.

That’s why I would urge you not to use drones to locate game after the shot. Let us embrace responsible hunting practices that promote conservation, respect for wildlife, and a true connection with nature.

Leave a Comment

How to determine the bow length
Alexander Knobloch

Bow Length For Height

Choosing which bow to purchase is undoubtedly a momentous decision for any archer. A misstep in the selection process can lead to less satisfactory accuracy and unnecessary monetary expenditure. When deciding which bow is right for you, it is valuable to consider the best bow length for height regarding correct bow fitment. Every archer is

Read More »
stabilizer bow and string stop in bow case_1
Josh Boyd

How To Balance A Bow With Stabilizers

Archery is a pursuit where precision is paramount. No matter how minute, every detail can be the difference between a triumphant shot and a frustrating miss. As a seasoned bowhunter, I’ve learned that consistency is king, and to achieve that, one must strive to eliminate variables that can throw off a shot. A key element

Read More »
a man aiming with a compound bow
Hunting Strategies
Alexander Knobloch

Our Guide: Bow Hunting Small Game

Although many archers hunt big game species such as deer, elk, and bear every year, far fewer individuals capitalize upon the numerous small game bowhunting opportunities. Small-game bowhunting has several benefits and can be extremely enjoyable. Small game bow hunting greatly extends your opportunity to go afield. This is because most states offer small game

Read More »